Why you must believe in God

topic posted Thu, October 27, 2005 - 1:25 PM by  Doc Squat /
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
If you were able to read the heading of this posting, then you must believe in God. At least, you must believe that god exists as a *word*. As a word, god implies a mental construct. A very vague mental construct, that everyone sees a bit differently, argues about endlessly, and even kills others over.

You must believe that people get very agitated over this word, because of their mental constructs -- even the "atheist" acknowledges this. In your mind, you may think that someone else's construct cannot possibly exist, but you are only arguing from the perspective of your own mental construct of what "god" means. Their construct is different from yours. Even people within the same sects argue about god. There will be no end to arguing about this most vaguely defined of all words. The word exists. The mental construct exists. "God" exists. Get over it. Stop arguing with idiots.

I joined this tribe just to say that.
posted by:
Doc Squat /
SF Bay Area
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Why you must believe in God

    Thu, October 27, 2005 - 2:51 PM
    So by this logic, there is a table by itself. Both of us imagine the 4 chairs around the table each of various types and this makes the chairs actually exist? Matter and energy are created out of nothing by the process of imagination.
    • Re: Why you must believe in God

      Sun, October 30, 2005 - 1:06 AM
      >Both of us imagine the 4 chairs around the table each of various types and this makes the chairs actually exist?

      The "chairs" exist as a word and as your individual mental construct of what "chair" means. As for whether the chairs actually exist, if everyone in the room believes they exist, then they exist in that context. That's not to say you're all delusional, and there are really no chairs in the room. If this paragraph makes any sense, then you believe in chairs as a word and a mental construct, whether or not you believe there are chairs in the room is up to you to argue with the other's present. But if you believe there are no chairs present, why would you argue with people who believe there are chairs present? Do you enjoy arguing with madmen and fools?

      Is Schrodinger's cat alive or dead, or both?
  • Re: Why you must believe in God

    Thu, October 27, 2005 - 3:50 PM
    >>"The word exists. The mental construct exists. "God" exists."

    You totally convinced me the word God exists, but I still checked the dictionary to be sure and it appears you are correct. I found another very important word there; ether... seems there was a big arguement about its existence back in the 19th century. The word still exists, so hmmm, by your faultless logic the ether exists.

    >>"Stop arguing with idiots"

    If you did not want us to argue with you, why did you post here.
    • Re: Why you must believe in God

      Sun, October 30, 2005 - 1:15 AM
      >The word still exists, so hmmm, by your faultless logic the ether exists.

      You just said it exists in the dictionary. It exists as a word and a concept. Whether you believe in it or not is your business. I believe in ether as an organic compound that puts people to sleep. Maybe that's not the same ether you're talking about.

      The god that I know exists, exists in the minds of people who use the concept as a mystery catch-all for everything they don't understand (or other people use it to invoke some special sense of power that their ego alone doesn't give them).

      So there ya go; my concept of both ether and god may be different from yours. I'm not going to argue with you if you think ether is something that comes out of a swamp and causes yellow fever... nor will I argue with you if you think god is telling you to get a gun and shoot your co-workers. I will, however, have a sense that civilization is definitely on the decline if I run into too many people with those sensibilities (and that seems to be the case?!)
      • Re: Why you must believe in God

        Sun, October 30, 2005 - 6:31 AM
        You just claimed - <<"God" exists. Get over it.>>

        burden of proof is in your lap so feel free to prove it at your earliest convenience.
        • Re: Why you must believe in God

          Mon, October 31, 2005 - 12:56 AM
          >burden of proof is in your lap so feel free to prove it at your earliest convenience.

          Read all of the above. What else is there to prove?

          Do you want me to prove that you can read, and that you interpret the letters g-o-d as a word that doesn't exist, or a mental construct that doesn't exist in your mind or someone elses? I can't prove whether something exists in your mind. I have a pretty good inclination that you're literate, and you have a mental construct for the term g-o-d. And in your mind, you believe that the god in other people's minds doesn't exist. There is a "god" construct in your mind that the logical portion of your brain places in the "imaginary foolishness" category.

          But this is all speculation on my part regarding what exists in your mind.
        • Re: Why you must believe in God

          Wed, November 23, 2005 - 8:07 AM
          prove it how?? prove it so that "you" can understand how i believe god is??? sorry, thats up to you to prove god exists!
          in your own way!

          its in the eye of the beholder, not in someone else's eye for you to behold!
          • Re: Why you must believe in God

            Wed, November 23, 2005 - 11:47 AM
            >>"ts in the eye of the beholder, not in someone else's eye for you to behold!"<<

            This statement is actually very insightful, seemingly without trying to be so- the implication of the statement "ts in the eye of the beholder" is that God exists only in someone's mind and has no separate or real existence; inadvertently confirming the atheist viewpoint.

            On another level it says everyone’s conception of God is different. If this is true, does not this very fact suggest that it is not a real thing that we might be dealing with? Could we say, for instance, that everyone’s conception of an elephant is different? Perhaps certain aspects of our conceptions of elephants differ, but if we drew a picture and described an elephant to just about anyone, they could probably go to a zoo and find one, even never having seen one.

            I would like to let you know that after a diligent search that I have found God. I know exactly what he is and I can describe him to you in such a way that you can find him just like you might find the elephant at the zoo. God is the personification of your hopes and dreams and nothing more. Since we all have different hopes and dreams, everyone’s God is different. This is all that he is and nothing more. I would add that worshipping your hopes and dreams, besides being a bit silly, seems sinful to me- but not as sinful as trying to push your God, your personal hopes and dreams on someone else. How can there be sin without God, you wonder? This is because sin is something that has a bad effect on your life or the lives of others and belief in God, I am convinced, is one of the most sinful things that any man might do.
            • Re: Why you must believe in God

              Wed, November 23, 2005 - 12:05 PM
              I'm new here and please forgive for butting into your conversation, but I just wanted to say to Rene Right On! I couldn't agree more.
              • Re: Why you must believe in God

                Wed, November 23, 2005 - 1:02 PM
                >>"Right On! I couldn't agree more"<<

                Thanks for the positive coment. Sometimes I feel as if I am argueing against the whole world, so it is good to know a few people agree with me on at least a few things.
            • Re: Why you must believe in God

              Thu, November 24, 2005 - 7:54 AM
              first i must thank you for the compliment for being insightful. i was trying to be simple and to the point n how i view "my" understanding of god. but you cant, in my opinion, compare an elephant to the concept of god due to the fact that you can actually go to a zoo to see an elephant in person, but not to see "god" locked in a cage now can you???

              i am far from being athiest, i believe in a power that is much greater than i that has done so much more than what you see everyday, ie trees, animals humans so on.

              whats wrong with having a different view, concept, understanding of what god is in yours, and my life?? if you are happy and peace with "your" beliefs so life this life and spread your love not condem
              • Re: Why you must believe in God

                Thu, November 24, 2005 - 10:36 AM
                >>"spread your love not condem"<<

                I make no condemnations. I only try to point out things that appear to be inaccurate representations of reality and try to point people in the right direction. If a child has some notion of reality that is wrong is it an act of love or condemnation to correct their error?

                >>"but you can't, in my opinion, compare an elephant to the concept of god"<<

                And this is the very reason that it makes sense to believe in elephants and not believe in gods.
                • Re: Why you must believe in God

                  Fri, November 25, 2005 - 12:59 AM
                  >>"to point people in the right direction"<<

                  Your direction might not be the right direction for others, have you thought of this, thats quite arrogant of you to assume that your way is better than the path that people are already on!! and one again you are using examples that have no use in this conversation, are you a parent? i have 2 kids and the dutiy as a parent is to lead by exapmle, it must come from an act of love to lead them, guide them so that they will find thier own way. but if we as kids teenagers and adults dont make "mistakes" (if you believe in right and wrong) how do we learn??

                  is god tangable to you, elephants are to me but my god is within me a feeling of love and trust!

                  >>inaccurate representations of reality<<

                  what is reality, yours is yours and mine is mine no!!
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Why you must believe in God

                    Fri, November 25, 2005 - 10:29 AM
                    >>"what is reality, yours is yours and mine is mine no!!"

                    I am of the opinion that there is only one reality, although there are many perceptions of it. The goal of learning would be to acquire the most accurate perception of reality that is possible. Your perception and all others actually are valuable to me in that seeing things from many points of view is the best way to understand them better. If someone's perception appears to be completely out of touch with reality, it should be valuable to help them see this. If you think that it is better to live your life within a fantasy, then reality or anyone else's perception of it would not be important to you.
      • Re: Why you must believe in God

        Mon, October 31, 2005 - 6:56 AM
        >>"The god that I know exists, exists in the minds of people"

        There is no doubt that this is a correct statement, but how is it pertinent in any meaningful way to any meaningful discussion. We can imagine a trillion imaginary things such as God and give them all names, so....

        The only meaningful discussion might be whether the imaginary things have any correspondence to the reality we are able to observe. If they don't, perhaps it would be better that we do not name them and clutter up our minds with useless concepts. This last stipulation seems to aptly apply to the concept of God, so I will put in the first vote to delete it from our vocabulary.
  • Re: Why you must believe in God

    Mon, October 31, 2005 - 11:25 AM
    To go back to the original post: "The mental construct exists. "God" exists. Get over it. Stop arguing with idiots."

    It would be nice if we lived in a world where people's imaginary contructs, such as God, are of no consequence and we could ignore them. Unfortunately, history has shown us that these imaginary contructs are dangerous. People frequently kill other people based on these kinds of ideas. Additionally, good people who are not idiots often get caught up in these ideas and make important life decisions based on them. Argueing with those who have these kinds of ideas with the intention of helping them see the world more clearly, thus has two very useful goals. First it makes the world a less dangerous place, assuming you can help them see more clearly, and secondly, it might save them from themselves and allow them to make productive use of their time and talents.

    • Re: Why you must believe in God

      Fri, November 4, 2005 - 11:34 AM
      Bravo. Note: the word "god" will never be deleted from the dictionary, no matter how many atheists or agnostics get together and vote on it -- there will always be a pocket of "believers."

      Prosecuting the believers only hardens their belief, and telling them they are delusional only makes them believe that you are delusional.

      Unless one is willing to resort to violence (which many believers are), one must approach from a "caring" tack. Do atheists/agnostics do much to show that their lives are quantifiably "better" for their lack of belief ? On the contrary, studies show that religious belief and prayer can result in healthier lives -- if only because humans are social animals and not constantly fighting the majority can reduce stress.

      Rather than proving that god does or doesn't exist, I throw the burden on the minority to PROVE that disbelief makes one's life quantifiably better (forget any internal psychological comfort one derives from "knowing you're right). "We" "know" "God" doesn't exist. So what? How does that make your life better? Can you prove to anyone who believes in god that your life is better? The burden is not on the majority, but on the minority to justify its irregularity. Is the stray result an error or the indicator of a better paradigm?

      Prove it?! Prove it ?! Prove it?! The chorus of unhappy scientists clinging to the status quo... I say show that your life is better by your conclusions and avoid asking the majority to prove their old, false assumptions. Did anyone have to prove the world was flat? No. It was assumed, until someone came along with a better explanation. While non-believers "know" there is no god, the mechanics of their paradigm have not shown superior acceptance among those who cling to a flat earth. Only when there is widespread acceptance of alternatives to church and prayer will these paradigms die out. Just not believing or not attending is not a viable alternative for many -- one must provide active substitutions -- social networks, music, architecture, and a linked social framework of appreciation.
      • Re: Why you must believe in God

        Fri, November 4, 2005 - 12:59 PM
        >>"Bravo. Note: the word "god" will never be deleted from the dictionary, no matter how many atheists or agnostics get together and vote on it -- there will always be a pocket of "believers.""<<

        I wish I had this ability of yours to fortell the future. Perhaps you could tell me where I will be on New Year's Eve in the year 2012, when the Mayan calander ends and exactly what will happen then?

        I make no predictions, but my feeling is that truth and knowledge will eventually prevail over superstition and foolishness. This is the only "faith" that I have- as certainly there is little reason to believe this from what we now see in our world or what we know of the past.

        Your arguement that believing in foolishness is healthy seems absurd to me. Yes, I have read about the same studies as you and the results can most easily be explained by the fact that religious belief and prayer are social activities that can enliven anyone's communal life. People do a lot better when they are not alone. Babies die when they are left alone. People with pets are happier and healthier than when left alone. There is absolutely no need for any God beliefs to achieve the same effects, but even if there were, it would still not be any kind of valid arguement to support a belief in God.

        >>"We" "know" "God" doesn't exist. So what? How does that make your life better?<<

        Having a more accurate picture of reality certainly makes our lives better. A few simple examples: I will not spend any time kneeling in a church listening to boring sermons. I will not cut the hearts out of any young girls in order to get God to make the rains come. If I am in trouble, I will not waste time praying to God- instead I will look for real solutions to my problems and take responsibility for what occurs in my life. I will not imagine that the future has already been determined by God and therefore not do anything to try to change it and make it better. I won't be flying any airplanes into any tall buildings in order to please God. I will not be doing any pennace in March in order to please God. Every day I will wake up with a smile, realizing that my life, my health, my future, what I should do and what I should not do are mostly up to me, I will have no fear of hell, no demoralizing notion that my life on earth is just a prelude and life after death is what is important. Knowing all this, I will make sure to make the most of the life that I do have, for there most likely will not be a second chance.

        >>"Prosecuting the believers only hardens their belief, and telling them they are delusional only makes them believe that you are delusional"

        I would never prosecute anyone or forceably coerce them in any way, but contrary to what you say it is useful to point out when people appear to be delusional. Every human being requires feedback from the environment in order to justify what he believes to be true. If we are silent while people make incredible claims, they are more likely to think they have said something credible. Believers feed on other believers to bolster their faith and get the feedback they need. This is why religions need meetings and churches whereas, non-believers do not need these things. Additionally, believers truly hate and fear non-believers- infidels- because they threaten to collapse their castles in the sky, simply by the fact that they do not believe.

        Non-believers do not have these problems; it is really much easier to simply laugh and walk on by. I have a suspicion that this is really what most people do- that most people deep down inside are non-believers, but in this religion dominated society it is easier to just play the game and pretend to believe. Unfortunately, this keeps the fools fed and their need to devour the non-believers can never be satisfied until everyone kneels humbly before their God.
        • Re: Why you must believe in God

          Mon, November 28, 2005 - 5:56 PM
          Umm... ghost is in the dictionary. So is goblin. So is hobbit. So is dragon. So are many othe fantastical creatures. They all exist, as words, and fantastical images. Are they real? Do they exist in this tangible reality in which we all live?
          • Re: Why you must believe in God

            Fri, December 2, 2005 - 1:57 AM
            >Umm... ghost is in the dictionary. So is goblin. So is hobbit. So is dragon. So are many othe fantastical creatures.

            They exist in some people's imagination, and some people think they're real. If a huge percentage of a population believed in them, you'd need some way of dealing with those people (rather than trying to convince them that *they're* the ones who are insane and not you. So you need to understand their concepts.

            I've heard various tellings of a story about trying to vaccinate children of people who didn't understand anything about medicine -- the parents thought the vaccine was evil, so they cut off the children's arms.

            If you believe the children need to be vaccinated, you'd better come up with some way to convince the parents that you're doing something good. Germ theory is pretty imaginary if you don't have a microscope/lab. Humanists / Atheists have yet to convince the vast majority ("believers") that Humanists/Atheists are anything but self-absorbed egomaniacs. You need to understand the "god" that exists in the believer's minds if you want to accomplish anything. Or you can be like them, and not venture outside of your (smaller) circle of non-believers.
            • Re: Why you must believe in God

              Fri, December 2, 2005 - 2:26 AM
              "If you believe the children need to be vaccinated, you'd better come up with some way to convince the parents that you're doing something good. Germ theory is pretty imaginary if you don't have a microscope/lab."

              Well, aren't microscopes and lab equipments the very tool by which people were convinced that that the "Germ theory" is far from being a mere figment of imagination?

              I don't think the logic would be correct if you deprive us of the very means of proof.

              Same I believe would be for "god", anyone is free to make any device or construct whatsoever to prove its existence. Only then would the question of "Is God real?" be answered in the context of knowing if "Are Germs real?".

              "Humanists / Atheists have yet to convince the vast majority ("believers") that Humanists/Atheists are anything but self-absorbed egomaniacs."

              These is the sad thing. There exist no known equipment (as I'm aware of) which enable anyone to see God, yet still many believe running contrary to anyone's experience.

              I remember when I was a mere child believing there was such a thing as a Santa Claus in the North Pole. My opinion is that our society is still just like a mere child blindly clinging still to concepts handed down to them by their ancestors.

              Who knows? Maybe in the end our society would mature? Or follow some other path we could not envision. Would they laugh at us for being such an egomaniacs?

              • Re: Why you must believe in God

                Fri, December 9, 2005 - 1:25 AM
                >Well, aren't microscopes and lab equipments the very tool by which people were convinced that that the "Germ theory" is far from being a mere figment of imagination?
                =============================
                Exactly. So how do you convince someone who has never seen a microscope that there are things called germs that cause disease and not "spirits" causing disease? Do you start by puncturing their arm with a piece of steel and telling them it's going to make them safe ? Wait. Puncturing my arm with a piece of steel will protect me from "little creatures" that cause disease? How ? How can you expect someone to make that leap and believe someone entirely outside of their belief system ? One must start with smaller steps.
                ------------------
                ================
                -------------------
                >I remember when I was a mere child believing there was such a thing as a Santa Claus in the North Pole. My opinion is that our society is still just like a mere child blindly clinging still to concepts handed down to them by their ancestors.
                ==================
                Anyone who doesn't subscribe to your belief system is obviously inferior and thinks "like a child?" Maybe that thinking is child-like; imagining that someone whose preceeding generations have believed something are going to listen to you, a stranger, rather than follow what their ancestors have known for hundreds of years (maybe adolescent-like rather than child-like?). You, who have no respect for others, calling them "children", yet you expect them to listen to your logic ? Respect is a two way street, and no progress will ever be made as long as you call the other person childlike or ignorant. You might say you don't care, but when you are increasingly subject to the absurd decrees of fundamentalists, it's time to do something besides call them ignorant children. They're in power.
                ---------------------
                ==================
                ------------------------
                On the the other hand, if you do not fall in love with an imaginary being which you have created this means you are egotistical and self-absorbed.
                ==================
                Let's try this again. One belief system says "treat others as you would have them treat you." The other belief system says "Darwinian evolution demands that stupid people should die off, and you are all stupid -- I'm not." Now, I'm not saying that either belief system strongly adheres to either of these tenets, what I'm saying is that one group tends towards egomania, while the other group tends towards killing people who don't believe in their system. Egomania may not be as bad as killing people, but we're talking generalities here.
                • Re: Why you must believe in God

                  Fri, December 9, 2005 - 2:17 AM

                  I think what the good Doctor is trying to communicate is that we need to be aware (and respectful) of others' beliefs, even if we don't share them. I agree, for a few reasons:

                  1. No one is going to listen to what we say if we offend them ... we need to show the believers of the world that we godless people are just as polite, respectful and caring as they are; we share many of the same goals, our aspirations overlap to a large extent.

                  2. If we can make them think of humanity first, it follows that god will be second. I completely agree with the premise that the less we consider the idea of god, the better off we will be (there are _so_ many more important things in the world to focus our attentions on), but trying to pummel that into the heads of believers is no better than they trying to pummel their ideas into us. If we concentrate on just helping others -- irrespective of what they believe -- it sets a really good example in terms of doing the right thing, and in a more subtle way, promotes the idea that we have the power to take care of ourselves (and each other), and therefore don't need a god.

                  I am godless, no doubt about it (and I can't imagine being otherwise -- it just makes no sense to me), but i've been privileged to have a lot of friends -- really good ones -- that aren't. If we want believers to think of us godless people better (and therefore make them more likely to listen and actually ponder what we have to say), then we should treat them better. I don't have to believe in their god, not at all ... but I do need to believe in them. Likewise, I want them to believe in me.

                  Regards,

                  John, who fails at this all the time, but keeps trying

                  Falling You - exploring the beauty of voice and sound
                  www.fallingyou.com
                • Re: Why you must believe in God

                  Fri, December 9, 2005 - 1:34 PM
                  >>"Let's try this again. One belief system says "treat others as you would have them treat you." The other belief system says "Darwinian evolution demands that stupid people should die off, and you are all stupid -- I'm not."<<

                  I think you should keep trying. You appear to be a bit confused. None of the ideas you have put together follow any logical path. The golden rule is an ethical principle, held by most people which has nothing to do with any belief in God. Darwinian evolution does not necessarily preclude a God and it is not a belief system; it is a well-tested and accepted scientific theory used to explain how the diversity of life developed and continues to develop. The golden rule and the theory of evolution have nothing whatsoever to do with one another and one could accept or reject both ideas without contradiction. Also, one can accept or reject both of these ideas and still believe or not believe in God. They are simply unrelated ideas.

                  Your ideas that atheists tend toward egomania and theists tend toward killing people who do not share their imaginary friend are equally ill-founded. Atheistic communists are probably responsible for more deaths in the 20th century directly related to trying to force their ideas on others than any other group. Once again, you have tied together things that don't relate. Trying to force your ideas on others is a human trait that has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not you believe in God. Through the centuries theists have, of course, done this with relish, but it has nothing to do with the exact content of their belief. Likewise, there are egomaniacs in both the atheist and theist camps in equal numbers. The one trait an atheist tends to need, since he lives in a world dominated by theists is the confidence and ability to think for himself. Perhaps, you equate this to egomania, but they are not the same thing in any respect. If the world were equally spilt between atheists and theists, this trait would not be needed, so that again atheists and theists would exhibit this trait in equal numbers. The trait itself, has nothing to do with belief in God.

                  '>>You, who have no respect for others, calling them "children", yet you expect them to listen to your logic ?'<<

                  I think that this description of theists is accurate. It seems humans, coming into the world as totally helpless infants, require a strong belief in the all-powerful and all-knowing beings who take care of them, in order to learn and thrive. Once they move past this childhood need, it is hard for them to take full responsibility for their lives, hence the belief in a benevolent caretaker God.

                  Respect is something someone should earn, it should not be given to all. If you passed someone in the street howling at the moon, saying it was his way of praying to his god, would you respect him? He is really no different than all those people howling in their churches.

                  It would be foolish to try to convince the man howling at the moon or the people howling in their churches with logic. What they believe is not related to logic and they have no interest in this. Their belief is based on emotion, therefore disrespect; negative emotion- will have more effect than logic. Neither, of course, will be really effective, so in any case it is generally pointless to try to convince anyone not to believe in God. In my estimation, not believing in something like God comes naturally, requiring no convincing, since it is based on nothing to start with. Believing takes a lot of convincing, hence the need for churches and services. I endured twelve years of this in Catholic schools, yet was unconvinced. I really cannot imagine any reason someone would need to be convinced there is no God.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Why you must believe in God

                    Sun, December 11, 2005 - 11:42 AM

                    Rene,

                    I think I can see what you're saying (respect must be earned) but I don't see how disrespect is going to do anything but make believers think "gee, I don't want to hang around that athiest guy, and I don't want mny children to, either, nor my neighbors or friends." In other words, I prefer to make people more likely to think "gee, that guy is an athiest, but he's still really cool to me, and I have no problem with hanging with him more often."

                    If I can make the people I meet less likely to associate "godless" with negative emotions, that's one less arrow they have to attack other godless people with. If I can also make it less likely for godless people to be associated with non-ethical people, that's another arrow they don't have. The same goes for a myriad of other classifications that people use on each other. Eventually, they'll get to the point where they think "gee, that John guy respects me even if I don't share his beliefs, he's an ethical person, he cares about others and does the best he can, he tries to understand before making judgements, he's supportive of many of the same things I am, he's trying to make a positive change in the world we live in ... somehow it doesn't seem fair that he's going to hell, maybe I should reconsider why my faith dictates that he will. Maybe I should reconsider my faith, period."

                    So, if someone I meet howls at the moon because his faith dictates it, yet attributes the fact that he helps to feed those less fortunate than him to his moon-howling, i'm going to respect him for it, even if I think (and express) that his moon-howling has nothing to do with feeding people, that he would feed people even if he were to stop howling at the moon. This of course only works if the action his faith dictates isn't negative (if I meet someone who claims that he is able to help feed people because and only because he kills someone else, he won't get my respect).

                    In short, I don't believe in the god of people I meet, but I try to believe in _them_. I need a vessel for my faith, and I tried the god thing for many years, and it just never worked -- the idea of god just made it much harder for me to be content, and there is simply no question that I am far more well-balanced and content without god than I ever was otherwise, and i'll tell (and have told) that to anyone with whom i'm having a conversation about faith. People, though ... I can see / touch / interface with and in some cases even predict with a fair degree of accuracy, so humanity is a far better vessel for my faith.

                    So, in short -- despite what the subject of this thread says, it is not true that I must believe in god at all, though I do feel pretty strongly that we should believe in one another.

                    Regards,

                    John

                    Falling You - exploring the beauty of voice and sound
                    www.fallingyou.com
                    • Re: Why you must believe in God

                      Mon, December 12, 2005 - 9:01 AM
                      >>"So, in short -- despite what the subject of this thread says, it is not true that I must believe in god at all, though I do feel pretty strongly that we should believe in one another. "<<

                      John, I don't really disagree with the sentiments you express- this sounds like good, practical advice and it is probably more or less the way I actually go about my life. For instance, my parents remain commited Catholics and I respect their choice. I still respect most of the teachers that taught me in Catholic schools; I respect the people, but I do not respect their ideas about God. Here, among non-believers, it is easy to say that. In reality, my strategy is to simply ignore this subject altogether, so no one generally knows anything about what I believe or don't believe or whether I respect their beliefs.

                      In theory, however, it seems that showing disrespect is more likely to change belief than anything else. As an example, look at belief in UFO's piloted by aliens. This belief is routinely mocked in the media and throughout our culture and this disrespect has certainly minimized this belief. I am certain that there is more reason to believe in alien UFO's than to believe in God. Therefore it is clear that disrespect is a more powerful tool for governing belief than logic or anything else you might think of. That is basically what I was trying to get across earlier.
                • me
                  me
                  offline 34

                  Re: Why you must believe in God

                  Sun, December 11, 2005 - 10:20 AM
                  "One belief system says "treat others as you would have them treat you." The other belief system says "Darwinian evolution demands that stupid people should die off, and you are all stupid -- I'm not." "

                  Um, I know tons of people who believe in god who don't live by the first, and a lot of agnostics and even atheists who place compassion as their primary virtue. I fail to see how dividing all possible views into "Love vs Total Inhumanity", "Black vs White", or "Good vs Evil" is useful, let alone valid.
            • Re: Why you must believe in God

              Fri, December 2, 2005 - 6:42 AM
              >>"Humanists / Atheists have yet to convince the vast majority ("believers") that Humanists/Atheists are anything but self-absorbed egomaniacs."<<

              Let us follow this logic a bit. If you believe in something that is totally imaginary, that you cannot feel, see, touch, smell or even really picture exactly what it is, you are non-egotistical and non self-absorbed. On the the other hand, if you do not fall in love with an imaginary being which you have created this means you are egotistical and self-absorbed.

              There seems to be a failure of logic here. Do you actually believe this?
  • me
    me
    offline 34

    Re: Why you must believe in The Invisable Pink Unicorn

    Sun, December 11, 2005 - 10:13 AM
    Why you must believe in The Invisable Pink Unicorn. If you were able to read the heading of this posting, then you must believe in The Invisable Pink Unicorn. At least, you must believe that The Invisable Pink Unicorn exists as a *word*. As a word, The Invisable Pink Unicorn implies a mental construct. A very vague mental construct, that everyone sees a bit differently, argues about endlessly, and even kills others over.

    You must believe that people get very agitated over this word, because of their mental constructs -- even the "atheist" acknowledges this. In your mind, you may think that someone else's construct cannot possibly exist, but you are only arguing from the perspective of your own mental c... more » If you were able to read the heading of this posting, then you must believe in The Invisable Pink Unicorn. At least, you must believe that The Invisable Pink Unicorn exists as a *word*. As a word, The Invisable Pink Unicorn implies a mental construct. A very vague mental construct, that everyone sees a bit differently, argues about endlessly, and even kills others over.

    You must believe that people get very agitated over this word, because of their mental constructs -- even the "atheist" acknowledges this. In your mind, you may think that someone else's construct cannot possibly exist, but you are only arguing from the perspective of your own mental construct of what "The Invisable Pink Unicorn" means. Their construct is different from yours. Even people within the same sects argue about The Invisable Pink Unicorn. There will be no end to arguing about this most vaguely defined of all words. The word exists. The mental construct exists. "The Invisable Pink Unicorn" exists. Get over it. Stop arguing with idiots.

    I joined this tribe just to say that.
  • Re: Why you must believe in God

    Tue, April 18, 2006 - 6:57 PM
    "God" as a word obviously exists. That's vacuous and useless to point out, in my humble opinion. The serious question is whether that word designates something real in the world that approximates what most theists would call a "god": Omnipotent being; creator of the universe, etc. etc.

    You could apply your very same analysis to the word "Bigfoot" (i.e. the word exists), but that adds nothing to the question of whether there really is a big manlike creature in the Pacific Northwest.

Recent topics in "Agnostics"